Bassel G. Diebo, MD, FAAOS脊柱及脊柱侧弯外科医生
语言: 中文

本页尚无中文版本,现以英文显示。

Patients · Learn

Spinal Osteotomy

Short answer. A spinal osteotomy is a planned removal of bone that lets a surgeon reshape a stiff, bent spine. Smaller osteotomies remove bone from the joints at the back of the spine. Larger ones remove a wedge of bone, or a whole vertebra, and allow much bigger corrections but carry higher risks. Osteotomies are done as part of a spinal fusion, usually for people with a stiff, forward-bent spine ("flatback") or a severe curve.

What is it?

A healthy low back curves gently inward. This curve helps you stand upright without effort. In some people, the spine becomes stiff and bent forward. Doctors call this sagittal imbalance. When it happens after an earlier fusion that flattened the low back, it is often called flatback. People with this problem often bend their knees, lean on a cart or cane, or feel tired and sore after standing a short time.

If the spine is flexible, a surgeon can often straighten it with screws and rods alone. If the spine is stiff or already fused, the surgeon may need to remove some bone first. That is an osteotomy. Surgeons grade osteotomies from 1 to 6, from smallest to largest. The main types are:

  • Posterior column osteotomy (Smith-Petersen or Ponte). Removes parts of the small joints at the back of the spine. Each level gives about 9 degrees of correction on average. Several levels can be done.
  • Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). Removes a wedge-shaped piece of one vertebra, then closes the gap. Studies report about 27 to 36 degrees of correction at one level.
  • Vertebral column resection (VCR). Removes an entire vertebra and its discs. It is used for the most severe, rigid deformities. A review found average corrections of about 59 to 64 degrees.

Who might need it, and who usually doesn't?

An osteotomy may be an option for adults who:

  • have a stiff spine that bends forward or sideways and does not straighten when lying down
  • have flatback after an earlier fusion
  • have a sharp forward bend (kyphosis), sometimes after a fracture or infection
  • have symptoms that limit daily life and have not improved with other care

An osteotomy is usually not needed when:

  • the spine is still flexible enough to correct with screws and rods alone
  • the deformity is mild or causes few symptoms
  • health problems make a long, major surgery too risky

The surgeon usually chooses the smallest osteotomy that can reach the needed correction. Larger osteotomies give more correction but have more complications. In one study of young patients with severe curves, followed for about 9 years, complications occurred in 51.2% of patients after VCR and 34.1% after PSO.

What are the alternatives, including non-surgical care?

Non-surgical care includes physical therapy, pain medicines, injections and treating weak bones. These can ease symptoms, but they do not change the shape of a stiff spine. In studies of adult deformity, non-surgical care usually kept pain and disability about the same over 2 years.

Other surgical options may include a fusion without a large osteotomy, smaller osteotomies at several levels, or correcting the spine through the side or front of the body. Which option fits depends on how stiff the spine is, how much correction is needed, and your health.

What happens before surgery?

Imaging. You will have full-length standing X-rays. These show your whole spine, from neck to hips, while you stand. The surgeon measures how your spine lines up with your pelvis. Key measures include how far your upper body leans forward and how much your pelvis has tilted backward to make up for it. These measures help decide how much correction you need and which osteotomy to use. CT scans and MRI are often needed too.

Correcting too much can also cause problems. In one study, correcting beyond age-based targets was linked to more problems above the fusion, without extra benefit. Evidence note: Ideal targets are still debated and may differ by age.

Bone density, smoking, diabetes and nutrition. These matter a great deal for large spine surgery. A national guideline recommends checking bone health in people at risk for osteoporosis. In one study of complex deformity surgery, 19.2% of smokers had heavy bleeding during surgery, compared with 3.7% of nonsmokers. A national guideline advises extra counseling when HbA1c (a 3-month blood sugar test) is above 7.5%. Your heart, lungs and overall strength will also be checked.

What happens during surgery?

You are fully asleep (general anesthesia) and lie face down. The surgeon makes a cut down the middle of your back. Screws are placed in the vertebrae above and below the osteotomy. The surgeon then removes the planned bone, while protecting the spinal cord and nerves. The spine is carefully moved into its new position and held with rods. Bone graft is added so the bones heal together.

Nerve signals are usually watched during surgery. Osteotomy operations often take many hours. Blood loss can be large: about 2,000 mL on average for a PSO in one review. Most patients need a blood transfusion.

What are the risks?

Large osteotomies (PSO and VCR) are among the most complex spine operations. Complications are common.

  • Any complication: In a multicenter study of PSO and VCR, 78% of patients had at least one complication within 2 years. In a French multicenter study, the rate was 59.2%, and only 30% of patients were free of complications at 5 years. Smaller posterior column osteotomies had a complication rate of 24.2%.
  • Nerve problems: After PSO in the low back, 11.1% of patients had new nerve problems. They were permanent in 2.8%. In complex deformity surgery, 23% had new leg weakness at hospital discharge, and about 10% still had it at 2 years. Nerve problems were more common after VCR than PSO: 15.5% vs. 8.2%.
  • Heavy bleeding: In a study of 423 patients, 24% lost more than 4 liters of blood.
  • Tear in the nerve covering (dural tear): Rates range from 10% to 44%. Tears were more likely when the patient had earlier surgery at the same level. Evidence note: Reported rates vary widely between studies.
  • Broken rods: In a multicenter study, rods broke in 22% of PSO patients. In one study, adding extra rods lowered the rate from 36.4% to about 13% to 14%.
  • Another surgery: 27.5% to 33% of patients needed another operation within about 2 years. In a 10-year study, about half (52.4%) had needed another operation.
  • Death: In a study of 1,441 patients, 1.2% died within 30 days. Risk was higher with diabetes, lung disease and frailty.

What is recovery like?

Hospital stay. In a study of 300 patients, average stays ranged from 7.3 days for patients under 50 to 11.0 days for patients 80 and older. Another study reported an average of 8.2 days. Many patients spend 1 to 3 days in intensive care first. Some go to a rehab center before home.

Walking. A therapist helps you get up and walk soon after surgery. Walking is the main exercise early on.

Driving and work. In a study of adults fused to the pelvis, 97.4% returned to driving, on average about 4 months after surgery. Of those who worked, 88% returned, on average about 5.4 months after surgery. Evidence note: This study included deformity fusions in general, not only osteotomies. Do not drive while taking opioid pain medicine.

Final result. In one study, most of the quality-of-life improvement happened in the first 6 months. Results usually stay stable from 2 to 5 years.

What results can patients expect?

Results vary from person to person. No one can promise a specific result.

  • In a review of 431 patients who had PSO, average disability scores improved from 50.5 to 32.8 on a 0-to-100 scale. Lower is better.
  • In a study that followed PSO patients for at least 5 years, 87% reported being satisfied.
  • Results may differ by cause. In one study, patients with flatback after an earlier fusion improved less and needed more repeat surgeries (46%) than patients having their first deformity surgery (25%).
  • In one large study, patients who had major complications ended up with similar results at 2 to 5 years as patients who did not. Evidence note: Other studies found smaller benefits after complications.
  • In a 10-year study, improvements in disability were still present at 10 years. Evidence note: Long-term studies are small.

Questions to ask your surgeon

  • Why does my spine need an osteotomy, rather than screws and rods alone?
  • Which type of osteotomy do you recommend, and why that type?
  • How much correction do I need, and how did you decide?
  • What are my specific risks for nerve problems and heavy bleeding?
  • How will my bone density, smoking or blood sugar affect my risk? What should I fix first?
  • How long will I be in the hospital, and will I need rehab?
  • What signs after surgery mean I should call right away?
Sources
  1. Schwab F, Blondel B, Chay E, et al. “The comprehensive anatomical spinal osteotomy classification.” Neurosurgery, 2015. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000462076.73701.09. PMID 25692366.
  2. Dorward IG, Lenke LG, Stoker GE, et al. “Radiographical and clinical outcomes of posterior column osteotomies in spinal deformity correction.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000302. PMID 24583718.
  3. Kim KT, Lee SH, Suk KS, Lee JH, Jeong BO. “Outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance of multiple etiologies: a retrospective review of 140 patients.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182552fd0. PMID 22433502.
  4. Makineni PS, El-Abtah ME, Porto JR, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC. “Pedicle subtraction osteotomies for surgical correction of fixed sagittal imbalance: a meta-analysis and systematic review.” Neurosurgery, 2024. doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003008. PMID 38904379.
  5. Yang C, Zheng Z, Liu H, et al. “Posterior vertebral column resection in spinal deformity: a systematic review.” Eur Spine J, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3767-7. PMID 25599850.
  6. Zhang Y, Wang S, Bai Z, et al. “High-grade 3-column osteotomies are not interchangeable: Schwab-grade-III PSO versus Schwab-grade-V VCR in treating severe kyphoscoliosis with an average 9-year follow-up.” J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2026. doi:10.2106/JBJS.25.01393. PMID 42013198.
  7. Smith JS, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, et al. “Outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for adult spinal deformity: a prospective, multicenter, propensity-matched cohort assessment with minimum 2-year follow-up.” Neurosurgery, 2016. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000001116. PMID 26579966.
  8. Diebo BG, Henry J, Lafage V, Berjano P. “Sagittal deformities of the spine: factors influencing the outcomes and complications.” Eur Spine J, 2015. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3653-8. PMID 25387425.
  9. Park SJ, Park JS, Kang DH, et al. “Association of age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis correction with long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2025. doi:10.3171/2025.3.SPINE241155. PMID 40644719.
  10. Dimar J, Bisson EF, Dhall S, et al. “Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for perioperative spine: preoperative osteoporosis assessment.” Neurosurgery, 2021. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab317. PMID 34490883.
  11. Wilson JRF, Jiang F, Badhiwala JH, et al. “The effect of tobacco smoking on adverse events following adult complex deformity surgery: analysis of 270 patients from the prospective, multicenter Scoli-RISK-1 study.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003200. PMID 31415459.
  12. Harrop JS, Mohamed B, Bisson EF, et al. “Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines for perioperative spine: preoperative surgical risk assessment.” Neurosurgery, 2021. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyab316. PMID 34490886.
  13. Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Klineberg E, et al. “Complication rates associated with 3-column osteotomy in 82 adult spinal deformity patients: retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter consecutive series with 2-year follow-up.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2017. doi:10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16849. PMID 28291402.
  14. Lainé G, Le Huec JC, Blondel B, et al. “Factors influencing complications after 3-columns spinal osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance from multiple etiologies: a multicentric cohort study about 286 cases in 273 patients.” Eur Spine J, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07410-9. PMID 36192454.
  15. Buchowski JM, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. “Neurologic complications of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a 10-year assessment.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b2d52. PMID 17873818.
  16. Lenke LG, Fehlings MG, Shaffrey CI, et al. “Neurologic outcomes of complex adult spinal deformity surgery: results of the prospective, multicenter Scoli-RISK-1 study.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001338. PMID 26866736.
  17. Lenke LG, Shaffrey CI, Carreon LY, et al. “Lower extremity motor function following complex adult spinal deformity surgery: two-year follow-up in the Scoli-RISK-1 prospective, multicenter, international study.” J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018. doi:10.2106/JBJS.17.00575. PMID 29664852.
  18. Bianco K, Norton R, Schwab F, et al. “Complications and intercenter variability of three-column osteotomies for spinal deformity surgery: a retrospective review of 423 patients.” Neurosurg Focus, 2014. doi:10.3171/2014.2.FOCUS1422. PMID 24785483.
  19. Hamouda AM, Pennington Z, Astudillo Potes M, et al. “The predictors of incidental durotomy in patients undergoing pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the correction of adult spinal deformity.” J Clin Med, 2024. doi:10.3390/jcm13020340. PMID 38256474.
  20. Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, et al. “Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2014. doi:10.3171/2014.9.SPINE131176. PMID 25325175.
  21. Lyu Q, Lau D, Haddad AF, Deviren V, Ames CP. “Multiple-rod constructs and use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in relation to lower rod fracture rates in 141 patients with adult spinal deformity who underwent lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2022. doi:10.3171/2021.3.SPINE201968. PMID 34560633.
  22. Yamato Y, Hasegawa T, Yoshida G, et al. “Ten-year follow-up report of corrective fusion with 3-column osteotomy in adult patients with spinal deformities: a retrospective case series.” Eur Spine J, 2026. doi:10.1007/s00586-025-09467-8. PMID 41102457.
  23. Carbone J, Ratanpal A, Chiu AK, et al. “Risk factors for mortality after 3-column osteotomy.” Eur Spine J, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00586-024-08616-9. PMID 39714467.
  24. Lau D, Osorio JA, Deviren V, Ames CP. “The relationship of older age and perioperative outcomes following thoracolumbar three-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity: an analysis of 300 consecutive cases.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2018. doi:10.3171/2017.10.SPINE17374. PMID 29624129.
  25. Maayan O, Zhang B, Fourman MS, et al. “Return to activities of daily living after fusion to the pelvis for adult spinal deformity.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2024. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004988. PMID 40310764.
  26. Ayhan S, Aykac B, Yuksel S, et al. “Safety and efficacy of osteotomies in adult spinal deformity: what happens in the first year.” Eur Spine J, 2016. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3981-3. PMID 25947614.
  27. Taniwaki H, Matsumura A, Kinoshita Y, et al. “Analysis of factors related to patient satisfaction in adult spinal deformity with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.” Eur Spine J, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00586-024-08560-8. PMID 39586855.
  28. Tarawneh AM, Venkatesan M, Pasku D, Singh J, Quraishi NA. “Impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.” Eur Spine J, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06439-y. PMID 32382878.
  29. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Cheh G, Baldus C. “Results of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomies for fixed sagittal imbalance: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814b8371. PMID 17873810.
  30. Eskilsson K, Sharma D, Johansson C, Hedlund R. “Pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive analysis in 104 patients. Does the cause of deformity influence the outcome.” J Neurosurg Spine, 2017. doi:10.3171/2016.12.SPINE16585. PMID 28475018.
  31. Cerpa M, Zuckerman SL, Lenke LG, et al. “Long-term follow-up of non-neurologic and neurologic complications after complex adult spinal deformity surgery: results from the Scoli-RISK-1 study.” Eur Spine J, 2025. doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08683-6. PMID 39937191.

← All patient guides · Second opinion